Care: At least some of the information about this charity is no longer current. Use the ‘Search charity names’ box to see if there is a later review. If the latest review has a message like this, you are welcome to make your case for an updated review via email to firstname.lastname@example.org.
This is a charity review of Perth Bible College Inc (PBC), an organisation that seeks donations online and is a member of Missions Interlink. (Including the answers to the questions that the Australian charity regulator, the ACNC, suggests that you ask.)
For the previous review, see here.
Is it responsive to feedback?
- There is nothing on the website about feedback, complaints or PBC’s accountability.
- I sent them a draft of this review. Like the previous two years, they did not respond.
Is PBC registered?
- As a charity, yes.
- And as a WA incorporated association (A0390019Y).
- Its website and social media sites are in the name PBC Perth Bible College. As neither one of these, or both together, are not registered as business names, they are still contravening both the business names legislation and their enabling legislation.
- They do have two business names though: International Mission Teams is held by PBC and Centre for Biblical Counselling is held by Perth Bible College Inc.
- PBC still doesn’t have a fundraising licence in the state in which, per the ACNC Register, it operates. Nor in any of the other states that have a licensing regime applicable to charities.
What does PBC do?
- It’s all here.
What impact are they having?
- Nothing systematic found.
What do they spend outside the costs directly incurred in delivering the above impact, that is, on administration?
- The expenses are not classified to allow this calculation; for instance, ‘Personnel’ expenses are not classified by the function of the employee.
Do they pay their board members?
- Such payments are not prohibited by the constitution.
- It doesn’t look as if such payments are made.
Can you get a tax deduction?
Is their online giving secure?
- PayPal is used, so yes.
What choices do you have in how your donation is used?
- ‘General College Donation’
- ‘Library Donation’
- ‘Student Scholarship Fund’
- ‘International Mission Teams’
Is their reporting up-to-date?
- Yes (five months after year end, 11 days later than last year).
Does their reporting comply with the regulator’s requirements?
- AIS 2017: No
- PBC’s other names that it uses are missing.
- Three of the substantive figures in the ‘Comprehensive Income Statement summary’ are incorrect.
- No outcomes are reported.
- ‘WA Fundraising No.’ is blank.
- Financial Report 2017: No. Again, this year
- PBC’s directors produce special purpose financial statements, implying that any stakeholder can command PBC to prepare financial statements to suit them. As a bible college with a revenue of $1.19 m and 29 staff, this is implausible.
- There is no Statement of Changes in Equity
- The Statement of Profit or Loss is incorrect:
- no ‘Other comprehensive income’ is shown.
- ‘Assets written off’ have been excluded from expenses.
- ‘Donations’ are classified as ‘Other Income’.
- there is no calculation of ‘employee benefits expense’.
- neither buildings nor the library are depreciated.
- it uses a mixed classification for expenses.
- The Notes to and forming part of the accounts (sic)
- are missing many Notes, including one on related parties (an ACNC expectation).
- do not tell us why the directors think that PBC is not a reporting entity.
- do not explain the relationship between PBC and the other educational institutions with which it is associated.
- The Statement of Financial Position
- has a confusing (non-standard) classification of current liabilities, and
- divides, without explanation, the liabilities that are not current into ‘Non-Current Liabilities’ and ‘Long Term Liabilities’.
What financial situation was shown in that Report?
- The surplus as a percentage of revenue was increased from 4% to 8%.
- ‘Personnel expenses’ were 64% of expenses (68% last year).
- Working capital (current assets less current liabilities) increased from 120% to 150%.
- The long term financial structure, because of the land and (undepreciated) buildings they hold, is much healthier than the short-term structure.
What did the auditor say about the last financial statements?
- The auditor, Geoffrey Carslake, for Shreeve & Carslake, gave a ‘clean’ opinion.
If a charity, is their page on the ACNC Register complete/correct?
- Ethiopia and Kenya are missing from ‘Operates in (Countries)’.
- Its other names are missing.
- ‘Who the Charity Benefits’ omits the students.
- ‘Email’, ‘Phone’ and ‘Website’ are blank, but the ACNC says that these are not compulsory.
Where were your (net) donations sent?
- Although they operate, per the ACNC Register, in three countries other than Australia, the AIS 2017 discloses grants as zero. What do they do there?
Who are the people controlling the organisation?
- Not shown on the website, but
- From ‘Responsible Persons’ on the ACNC Register (with the same incomplete names as have existed for three years now):
To whom is PBC accountable?
- As a charity, to the ACNC.
- Missions Interlink, because it’s an Associate member.
- For one opinion on the strength of that accountability, see the section Activities in this review.
- And to the Western Australian associations regulator.
- “Good living and social concern are important [to the cause of evangelism], but they are not uniquely Christian graces…I’ve met a lot of fine Hindus, Muslims and atheists. Just living the life is not going to bring someone to Christ. There is much more to it than that. We must help people, certainly, but we must also share with them why we are motivated to do so. We must stand against injustice, poverty and need, but we must at the same time point to the One who brings justice and who can meet the deepest need. Until they know our reasons, how can they come to know our Lord?” [Dan Armstrong, the Fifth Gospel: The Gospel According to You, Anzea Books, pp. 13-14. ↑