Home / Charity Reviews /

Crossway Baptist Church

Care:  At least some of the information about this charity is no longer current.  Use the ‘Search charity names’ box to see if there is a later review.  If the latest review has a message like this, you are welcome to make your case for an updated review via email to ted@businessbythebook.com.au.

This is a review in the series ‘Members of Missions Interlink’, Missions Interlink being ‘the Australian network for global mission’[1]. Members must sign up to a set of standards, and this, at least on paper, makes them a better bet for your donations (or other involvement).

‘Crossway Baptist Church’[2] is one such member, an Associate.

The website linked from the Missions Interlink membership goes to a website in the name ‘Crossway’. Here they offer online giving.

Donors

The charities’ regulator, the ACNC, in their article, Donating to Legitimate Charities, gives “some things to consider to help you make sure your donation is going where it is intended”:

  1. Check the organisation’s name.
  2. Ask for identification from anyone seeking a donation.
  3. Be careful of online requests for donations.
  4. No tax deduction doesn’t mean the charity is not a legitimate one.
  5. Find out more about how the charity says it uses donations.

Here’s the results for ‘Crossway Baptist Church’, with #5 supplemented by the essentials of the ACNC’s What should I consider when deciding which charity to support?[3]

Question 1

A search of the Register of charities gives a registered charity in the name Crossway Baptist Church Inc (Crossway). The Register entry shows that Crossway is a member of an ACNC Group. These are the members of that Group:

They are grouped because Crossway controls the other three.

Crossway holds no registered business names, so should not be trading under anything other than its full name.

Question 2

Although they fundraise[4], as a church one would not expect Crossway to use door-to-door or street fundraisers.  And there is nothing to suggest that they do.

Question 3

The web address begins with a closed padlock symbol, so the website is secure [the ACNC article above[5]]. But on the giving pages there is nothing about the security of your personal information. (The Pushpay logo is at the bottom of each page. On the Pushpay website information about security is relegated to the footer.)

Question 4

‘Will my donation be tax deductible?’ [Crossway’s Register entry] says it operates two funds that allow it to do offer a tax deduction:

Although the Financial Report 2019 says (Note 1 (o)) that Crossway ‘operates’ the two tax deductible funds above[6], there is no further information about them, and nothing on the website.

From the information in Question 1 (above), and the lack of any mention of the ‘Crossway CRE Fund’ on the website, it appears that this fund has been converted into a company. There is no mention of giving on that company’s webpage.

The other Fund appears not to be used any longer.

With the above explanations, the giving page then makes sense:

But the reporting of the donations [Note 2, Financial Report 2019] does not match the above information:

‘General Offerings’ 6.39 million

‘Donations Community’ 1.85 million

‘Christmas Appeal income’ 304K

‘Missions income’ 201K

‘Fundraising’ 165K

‘Welfare fund income’ 72K

There is no explanation of these items.

Other than the identification of the Kingdom Fund as being part of Crossway, there is no information on it in the Financial Report 2019.

Question 5

The context

Vision, mission and values.

Activities: see ‘Ministries’ in the main menu.

  • One of these ‘ministries’ is ‘Praxeis’. This is confusing:
    • Although not mentioned anywhere, this is a separate registered charity.
    • But they operate from the same address, and the Senior Pastor of Crossway is on the Board of Praxeis.
    • And a report on its activities and results is included in Crossway’s Annual Report
    • But it is not included in the ACNC Group (see above).
    • And the relationship is not disclosed in the Financial Report 2019.
    • A footnote to the statistics implies that Praxeis is a separate organisation.

As for what Crossway did in 2019, see the 2019 Crossway Annual Report.

Sharing the Gospel[7]?

Yes

Locations

Crossway operates in Australia, per the Register, in all states except the Northern Territory and the ACT. But there are only ‘campuses’ in Victoria. Nothing could be found to support the inclusion of the other five states.

How activities translated into dollars spent

The audited account of how donations are used is the Financial Report 2019 on the ACNC Register.

The directors (unidentified) signed a Statement by Members of the Board that included this declaration [Financial Report 2019]:

For this to be true the financial statements had to comply, at a minimum, with the Australian Accounting Standards (AASs) [www.aasb.gov.au]. In turn, this means that the directors must present you with sufficient information to understand the full situation and performance of Crossway.

But there are material deviations from these Standards. So, no, the Report doesn’t present a ‘true and fair view’.

Special purpose financial statements

First up, they chose the lower-standard financial statements (called ‘special purpose’). This means that the directors can report less than they otherwise would have had to.

General purpose financial statements are the type that are designed for users who cannot ‘command the preparation of (financial) reports tailored so as to satisfy specifically all of their information needs’. Can you ring the Crossway office and get them to do this for you? I doubt it. Even if you can, can all the 2134 members [Annual Report]? It stretches credulity to think that they all have this kind of power.

This means that special purpose statements was the wrong choice.

The auditor, Jeffrey Tulk, a Principal in Saward Dawson, agreed with the Board’s choice. This is a highly questionable decision, both because of the argument given above and this opinion of his professional body[8]:

  • In addition to the 2134 members, there are many other stakeholders of the Crossway charities.
  • Most of the stakeholders are not involved in the management of Crossway (the Annual Information Statement (AIS) 2019 discloses a paid workforce of 128).
  • Crossway’s community impact is large.
  • Over 87% of its revenue came from donations.

Given this, special purpose statements again look completely unsupportable.

Expense disclosure

The disclosure of the expenses[9]is an inadequate communication of how $11.45 million of resources were consumed:

  • There is no obvious logic to the order of the expenses.
  • None of the expenses are explained. And some of them are far from industry standard terms.
    • What is ‘Generational Ministry expense’? And ‘Experience expense’?
    • What is the difference between the two coaching expenses?
  • It is a mixed classification (function and nature).
  • Administration and building expenses have been combined.
    • Yet ‘Depreciation and amortisation’ is separate.
  • There is little match between the expenses and the way Crossway says that it is organised (in its Annual Report):

Conclusion

The evidence points to a false declaration of a true and fair view.

Other issues

The logo of the auditor, Saward Dawson is on the cover of the Financial Report 2019, and more prominently than Crossway’s information. Given the importance of independence of the audit function, this is inappropriate.

The auditor charged $26K (no change from the previous year).

One of the board members had a conflict of interest in 2019, the management of which was not disclosed:

The use of donations

If you are still willing to rely on the accounts, the Statement of Income & Expenditure and Other Comprehensive Income shows the expenses for 2019. These were the ones that were over $250K:

Administration & Facility expense 2.90 million

International ministry expense 1.72 million

Generational Ministry expense 1.43 million

Depreciation and amortisation expense 1.11 million

Experience expense 764K

Building a Discipleship Culture, Missional Communities & Prayer expense  629K

Care & Community Life Ministry expense 490k

Cafeteria expense 455K

Coaching expense 353K

Counselling expense 333K

Coach program expense 314K

Employees

From the Annual Information Statement (AIS) 2019:

The employees cost $6.32 million ($5.46 million the previous year) [Note 3, Financial Report 2019].

  • That’s an average of $82K per FTE employee.

Missions

Money given to ‘other missions’ was $49K. Less than ½% of total expenses. Only one expense was smaller.

The amount ‘set aside for the purpose of reaching the unreached people group of the 10/40 window’ (the Strategic Missions Reserve) is 20% of the created reserves, and ½% of equity.

People responsible

The directors in office at the time of the approval of the accounts are not identified, but these are the Responsible People now:

Dale Stephenson (Senior Pastor)

Edward Harrison

Jonathan Russ

Kerryn Zwag

Michael Elias

Olive Chow

Russell Oettinger

Scott Pilgrim (Executive Pastor)

He is also the Executive Director of this charity.

Impact

See this review.

Crossway’s response

The introduction to the Mission Interlink standards (see above) includes this statement:

We sent them a draft of this review. They…did not respond.

 

 

  1. https://missionsinterlink.org.au/about/. And a means for a Member (not an Associate) to get income tax exemption when it might not otherwise be available.
  2. Focus on the nature of the charity’s work, its beneficiaries and the impact the charity is having in the community. Is it clear what the charity is trying to achieve and how its activities work towards its objectives? Would you like to spend your money, or time if volunteering, to support these objectives? Is the charity being transparent about its activities? [A section in the article, Donating and Volunteering].
  3. This is the current campaign:
  4. ‘https’ does not, as implied by the ACNC, appear in all browsers.
  5. ‘When Helping Hurts by Brian Fikkert and Steve Corbett says this about sharing the Gospel: ‘A host of contextual issues determine the best manner and the appropriate time to present the gospel verbally, particularly in militant Muslim or Hindu settings. But without such a presentation, it is not possible for people to be personally transformed in all their relationships, which is what poverty alleviation is all about [Kindle Locations 1262-1264, Moody Publishers].
  6. Enhancing Not-for-Profit Annual and Financial Reporting, March 2013, accessed from their website March 2020.
  7. From the Statement of Income & Expenditure and Other Comprehensive Income [Financial Report 2019] (with the previous year in the second column):
Share